AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance Vs Traditional Maintenance Approaches in Manufacturing


This research presents a comparative analysis of AI-driven predictive maintenance and traditional maintenance approaches, including reactive and preventive maintenance, within the manufacturing sector. Reactive maintenance, a run-to-failure strategy, often leads to significant downtime and costly repairs, while preventive maintenance schedules regular checks to reduce breakdowns but can result in over-maintenance and inefficiencies. Predictive maintenance, enhanced by AI, uses real-time sensor data, machine learning algorithms, and cloud-edge computing to predict equipment failures before they occur. Experimental results show that predictive maintenance outperforms both reactive and preventive methods in key metrics such as downtime, maintenance cost, repair frequency, and mean time between failures (MTBF). By leveraging AI to analyze equipment conditions, predictive maintenance ensures timely interventions, optimizing operational efficiency and reducing overall costs. These findings demonstrate the superiority of predictive maintenance in enhancing equipment reliability and cost-effectiveness in manufacturing environments.
PDF